Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/107996
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMortensen, C.-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationModern Greek Studies (Australia and New Zealand), 2015; 15-22-
dc.identifier.issn1039-2831-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/107996-
dc.description.abstractModal Logic is the logic of necessity, possibility and impossibility. But twentieth century modal logic faced an epistemological problem: how we know the modal status of propositions. Diodorus Cronus, 3rd century BCE, offered an account of modality which avoids the epistemological problem by grounding modality in tense. His argument is plausible and justly famous, becoming known as The Master Argument of Diodorus. This paper uses a combination of modal and tense logics to identify the exact logic that the Master Argument commits us to.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityChris Mortensen-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherJohns Hopkins University Press-
dc.rightsCopyright in each contribution to this journal belongs to its author. © 2015, Modern Greek Studies Association of Australia and New Zealand All rights reserved. No part of this publication may reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher.-
dc.source.urihttp://muse.jhu.edu/journal/126-
dc.titleThe master argument of Diodorus Cronus as an alternative account of modality-
dc.typeJournal article-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidMortensen, C. [0009-0001-3942-2126]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 3
Linguistics publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.