Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/123282
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Understanding Australian policies on public health using social and political science theories: reflections from an Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia Workshop
Author: Baum, F.
Graycar, A.
Delany-Crowe, T.
de Leeuw, E.
Bacchi, C.
Popay, J.
Orchard, L.
Colebatch, H.
Friel, S.
MacDougall, C.
Harris, E.
Lawless, A.
McDermott, D.
Fisher, M.
Harris, P.
Phillips, C.
Fitzgerald, J.
Citation: Health Promotion International, 2018; 34(4):833-846
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Issue Date: 2018
ISSN: 0957-4824
1460-2245
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Fran Baum, Adam Graycar, Toni Delany-Crowe, Evelyne de Leeuw, Carol Bacchi, Jennie Popay, Lionel Orchard, Hal Colebatch, Sharon Friel, Colin MacDougall, Elizabeth Harris, Angela Lawless, Dennis McDermott, Matthew Fisher, Patrick Harris, Clare Phillips, and Jane Fitzgerald
Abstract: There is strong, and growing, evidence documenting health inequities across the world. However, most governments do not prioritize policies to encourage action on the social determinants of health and health equity. Furthermore, despite evidence concerning the benefits of joined-up, intersectoral policy to promote health and health equity, it is rare for such policy approaches to be applied systematically. To examine the usefulness of political and social science theory in understanding the reasons for this disjuncture between evidence and practice, researchers and public servants gathered in Adelaide for an Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia (ASSA) Workshop. This paper draws together the learnings that emerged from the Workshop, including key messages about the usefulness of various theories as well as insights drawn from policy practice. Discussions during the Workshop highlighted that applying multiple theories is particularly helpful in directing attention to, and understanding, the influence of all stages of the policy process; from the construction and framing of policy problems, to the implementation of policy and evaluation of outcomes, including those outcomes that may be unintended. In addition, the Workshop emphasized the value of collaborations among public health researchers, political and social scientists and public servants to open up critical discussion about the intersections between theory, research evidence and practice. Such critique is vital to render visible the processes through which particular sources of knowledge may be privileged over others and to examine how political and bureaucratic environments shape policy proposals and implementation action.
Keywords: Determinants of health; evidence based policy; healthy public policy; politics
Rights: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
DOI: 10.1093/heapro/day014
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapro/day014
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.