Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/123557
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Passive house vs. passive design: sociotechnical issues in a practice-based design research project for a low-energy house
Author: Kroll, D.
Breen Lovett, S.
Jimenez-Bescos, C.
Chisnall, P.
Aitchison, M.
Citation: Architectural Science Review, 2020; 63(3-4):361-371
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Issue Date: 2020
ISSN: 0003-8628
1758-9622
Statement of
Responsibility: 
David Kroll, Sarah Breen Lovett, Carlos Jimenez-Bescos, Peter Chisnall and Mathew Aitchison
Abstract: Building performance simulation tools such as the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) can be invaluable for improving energy-efficiency in housing design. However, achieving improved energy performance is also a sociotechnical issue, and how this is dealt with during the architectural design process seems less well studied. This collaborative design research project for a low-energy prefab house with an industry partner, a manufacturer of Structural Insulated Panels (SIP), is used as a case study to show that it is possible to achieve high energy performance while addressing specific socio-technical concerns within an Australian volume homebuilding market. A key issue that emerged in this project was the perceived tension between passive design expectations in Australia and those promoted through the Passive House software tool.
Keywords: Sustainable; housing; prefab; energy-efficiency; sociotechnical; Passive house
Rights: © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
DOI: 10.1080/00038628.2019.1697924
Grant ID: ARC
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2019.1697924
Appears in Collections:Architecture publications
Aurora harvest 4

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.