Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/128938
Type: Thesis
Title: Negative Self-evaluation and Withdrawal Behaviour Tendency in Shame: A replication study
Author: Min, Soyoung
Issue Date: 2019
School/Discipline: School of Psychology
Abstract: Negative self-evaluation (NSE) tendency and withdrawal behaviour tendency are two distinctive responses after shame experiences. While withdrawal tendency is a maladaptive aspect of shame, NSE is often considered adaptive. A major assessment of shame- and guilt-proneness, the Test of Self-Conscious Affect-3 (TOSCA-3), has been criticised for its conflated measure of these tendencies, whereas a newer scale, the Guilt and Shame Proneness scale (GASP), measures these tendencies separately. These two different tests have not been previously compared in a single study in relation to psychological symptoms and interpersonal traits. By replicating the GASP study, the difference between TOSCA-3 and GASP was investigated in relation to depressive symptoms, social anxiety symptoms and empathy in university students (N=116) via an online survey. Results revealed higher effect sizes on the TOSCA-3 for psychological symptoms than compared to the GASP. NSE was positively correlated with both psychological symptoms and empathy, while withdrawal (which was maladaptive in both conditions), was negatively correlated with interpersonal traits, and positively correlated with depressive and social anxiety symptoms. These results casts doubt on the function of NSE, demonstrating its adaptiveness in interpersonal situations while maladaptiveness in psychological functioning. Keywords: shame, negative self-evaluation tendency, withdrawal tendency, social anxiety, depression, empathy
Dissertation Note: Thesis (B.PsychSc(Hons)) -- University of Adelaide, School of Psychology, 2019
Keywords: Honours; Psychology
Description: This item is only available electronically.
Provenance: This electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the author of this thesis and do not wish it to be made publicly available, or you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legals
Appears in Collections:School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MinS_2019_Hons.pdf1.23 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.