Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/129098
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRedelinghuys, Maretha-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/129098-
dc.descriptionThis item is only available electronically.en
dc.description.abstractAttention influences perception of stimuli as well as mediated action. This allows us to interact with complex visual environments. Additionally, hand-eye movements are linked and occur in high levels of synchrony in daily tasks. Existing research examining attentional facilitation during these behaviours has mostly utilised simple paradigms that are not representative of naturalistic settings. This study bridges the existing literary gap by documenting the effect of perceptual grouping on attentional facilitation during hand-eye movements in a complex visual scene. Participants completed a saccade and reach task in two experimental conditions. Eye and hand movements were made to one of two targets after a probe (contrast increment) was displayed in an array of seven constantly present distractors. Attentional facilitation was quantified by correct probe identification. Surprisingly, perceptual grouping did not influence attentional facilitation, though probe location did. Results indicate higher perceptual performance at locations that were not directly in the eye-hand movement trajectory, which was unexpected. One location was completely overlooked, which is consistent with previous findings. The findings suggest a possible difference in attentional facilitation between simple and complex scenes and reaffirm the need for future studies to utilise more naturalistic spatial layouts when examining attentional facilitation.en
dc.subjectHonours; Psychologyen
dc.titleThe Effect of Perceived Perceptual Grouping on the Spatiotemporal Profile of Attention During Reaches and Saccadesen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Psychology-
dc.provenanceThis electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the author of this thesis and do not wish it to be made publicly available, or you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legals-
dc.description.dissertationThesis (B.PsychSc(Hons)) -- University of Adelaide, School of Psychology, 2019-
Appears in Collections:School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RedelinghuysM_2019_Hons.pdf4.99 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.