Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/129146
Type: Thesis
Title: A Meta-Analysis of Relationship Quality and Transgression Severity as Predictors of Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Forgiveness
Author: Kireta, Lara
Issue Date: 2018
School/Discipline: School of Psychology
Abstract: Forgiveness is a nebulous construct. There are many ways to define forgiveness, and as many ways to measure it. The two predominant ways to measure forgiveness are with relationship-focused measures (Interpersonal) and self-focused measures (Intrapersonal). With inconsistencies in predictor outcomes of forgiveness reported in forgiveness literature, this meta-analysis aimed to investigate whether the type of forgiveness measure used impacted upon these inconsistencies. To explore this issue, the current study meta-analysed results from 96 independent studies, exploring the correlations between Intrapersonal and Interpersonal forgiveness measures with two established predictors of forgiveness: Relationship Quality and Transgression Severity, to determine whether these predictor outcomes differed based on the type of measure used. The study hypothesised that Interpersonal measures would exhibit larger correlations between forgiveness and Relationship Quality and smaller correlations with Transgressions Severity, in comparison to Intrapersonal measures. Additionally, key study characteristics including the study design, transgression methodology and predictor measurement, were explored. Results demonstrated that contrary to expectations, Intrapersonal and Interpersonal measures reported similar effects on both predictors; with medium, positive correlations for Relationship Quality (r = .42, r = .38, respectively) and small negative correlations for Transgression Severity (r = -.26, r = -.23, respectively). These findings suggest that Intrapersonal and Interpersonal measures are consistently measuring forgiveness. However, additional exploratory analyses run on common Intrapersonal and Interpersonal measures showed discrepancy in predictor outcomes among the measure types. Thus, future research should investigate additional forgiveness predictors such as intent and apology, to shed more understandings into this matter.
Dissertation Note: Thesis (B.PsychSc(Hons)) -- University of Adelaide, School of Psychology, 2018
Keywords: Honours; Psychology
Description: This item is only available electronically.
Provenance: This electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the author of this thesis and do not wish it to be made publicly available, or you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legals
Appears in Collections:School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
KiretaL_2018_Hons.pdf2.59 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.