Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/129361
Type: Thesis
Title: Postmodern thought and individual experience: An interpretative phenomenological analysis
Author: van Antwerpen, Natasha
Issue Date: 2018
School/Discipline: School of Psychology
Abstract: Emerging predominately in the late 1970s through to the early 90s, postmodern thought encompasses a radical questioning of previous cultural and belief structures. This has led to criticisms of these ideas as nihilistic and detrimental to individuals’ identity and values, alongside claims of increased freedom and possibility. Given these criticisms and possibilities, the present study consisted of a qualitative investigation into the influence of postmodernism on the self, beliefs, and values. Seven participants participated in semi-structured interviews, which were analysed through an experience-based approach using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Four themes and 15 subthemes were identified in response to postmodernism: ‘ambivalence’; ‘uncertainty’; ‘responses to uncertainty’; and ‘self as an exception’. These findings were both consistent and inconsistent with criticisms of postmodernism, as participants expressed a sense of postmodernism as destabilising, however, the need for action and stability frequently led participants to respond with the strengthening of their beliefs, or an unwillingness to refute them. The experiences and responses of participants to postmodernism challenge the view that postmodern thinking has a negative influence upon individuals and their beliefs, although further research is needed. Based on the present study and its limitations, it is suggested that future research utilise both qualitative and quantitative methods in more targeted samples to investigate the relationship between postmodernism and conceptions of beliefs and values.
Dissertation Note: Thesis (B.PsychSc(Hons)) -- University of Adelaide, School of Psychology, 2018
Keywords: Honours; Psychology
Description: This item is only available electronically.
Provenance: This electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the author of this thesis and do not wish it to be made publicly available, or you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legals
Appears in Collections:School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
vanAntwerpenN_2018_Hons.pdf1.78 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.