Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/130749
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Davies, E.L. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gordon, A.L. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hooper, K.J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pelentsov, L.J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Esterman, A.J. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 2021; 42(9):845-854 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0161-2840 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1096-4673 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/130749 | - |
dc.description | Published online: 24 Mar 2021 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: The Needs in Recovery Assessment (NiRA) is a tool designed to support recoveryoriented and person-centred approaches in mental health services through facilitating the identification and prioritisation of needs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interrater reliability of the NiRA. Method: Ten mental health clinicians from various professional backgrounds used the NiRA to facilitate assessment interviews with Simulated Patients. Completed and semi-completed NiRA forms, questionnaires, and audio-visual recordings of assessment interviews were collected for analysis. The interrater reliability of the NiRA was calculated using percent agreement and Gwet’s Agreement Coefficient (AC)¹. Results: Percent agreement across all items of the finalised tool was 0.84 (item range: 0.55 to 1.0). Overall interrater reliability (Gwet’s AC¹ ) was 0.70 (95% CI 0.64-0.76) with items ranging from -0.08 to 1.0. Conclusion: The NiRA is a reliable tool and is ready to be trialled in a feasibility study in clinical settings. It is anticipated that the NiRA will facilitate a deeper understanding of service users’ needs and a more targeted approach to meeting unmet needs. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Ellen L. Davies, Andrea L. Gordon, Kenneth J. Hooper, Lemuel J. Pelentsov, and Adrian J. Esterman | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | - |
dc.rights | © 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC | - |
dc.source.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2021.1894618 | - |
dc.subject | Humans | - |
dc.subject | Reproducibility of Results | - |
dc.subject | Mental Health Services | - |
dc.subject | Needs Assessment | - |
dc.subject | Surveys and Questionnaires | - |
dc.title | Evaluating the reliability of the Needs in Recovery Assessment (NiRA) with simulated patients | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/01612840.2021.1894618 | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Davies, E.L. [0000-0002-4408-2461] | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Gordon, A.L. [0000-0002-4076-5708] | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Esterman, A.J. [0000-0001-7324-9171] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 4 Nursing publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.