Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/133644
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: My Baby's Movements: a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial of a fetal movement awareness intervention to reduce stillbirths
Author: Flenady, V.
Gardener, G.
Ellwood, D.
Coory, M.
Weller, M.
Warrilow, K.A.
Middleton, P.F.
Wojcieszek, A.M.
Groom, K.M.
Boyle, F.M.
East, C.
Lawford, H.L.S.
Callander, E.
Said, J.M.
Walker, S.P.
Mahomed, K.
Andrews, C.
Gordon, A.
Norman, J.E.
Crowther, C.
Citation: BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2022; 129(1):29-41
Publisher: Wiley
Issue Date: 2022
ISSN: 1470-0328
1471-0528
Statement of
Responsibility: 
V Flenady, G Gardener, D Ellwood, M Coory, M Weller, KA Warrilow, PF Middleton, AM Wojcieszek, KM Groom, FM Boyle, C East, HLS Lawford, E Callander, JM Said, SP Walker, K Mahomed, C Andrews, A Gordon, JE Norman, C Crowther
Abstract: Objective: The My Baby’s Movements (MBM) trial aimed to evaluate the impact on stillbirth rates of a multifaceted awareness package (the MBM intervention). Design: Stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial. Setting: Twenty-seven maternity hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Population: Women with a singleton pregnancy without major fetal anomaly at ≥28 weeks of gestation from August 2016 to May 2019. Methods: The MBM intervention was implemented at randomly assigned time points, with the sequential introduction of eight groups of between three and five hospitals at 4-monthly intervals. Using generalised linear mixed models, the stillbirth rate was compared in the control and the intervention periods, adjusting for calendar time, study population characteristics and hospital effects. Main outcome measures: Stillbirth at ≥28 weeks of gestation. Results: There were 304 850 births with 290 105 births meeting the inclusion criteria: 150 053 in the control and 140 052 in the intervention periods. The stillbirth rate was lower (although not statistically significantly so) during the intervention compared with the control period (2.2/1000 versus 2.4/1000 births; aOR 1.18, 95% CI 0.93–1.50; P = 0.18). The decrease in stillbirth rate was greater across calendar time: 2.7/1000 in the first versus 2.0/1000 in the last 18 months. No increase in secondary outcomes, including obstetric intervention or adverse neonatal outcome, was evident. Conclusions: The MBM intervention did not reduce stillbirths beyond the downward trend over time. As a result of low uptake, the role of the intervention remains unclear, although the downward trend across time suggests some benefit in lowering the stillbirth rate. In this study setting, an awareness of the importance of fetal movements may have reached pregnant women and clinicians prior to the implementation of the intervention.
Keywords: Awareness; best practice; decreased fetal movements; maternity care; mobile phone application; stillbirth
Description: First published: 23 September 2021
Rights: © 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16944
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1067363
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16944
Appears in Collections:Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.