Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/133876
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Artificial intelligence for pre-operative lymph node staging in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Author: Bedrikovetski, S.
Dudi-Venkata, N.N.
Kroon, H.M.
Seow, W.
Vather, R.
Carneiro, G.
Moore, J.W.
Sammour, T.
Citation: BMC Cancer, 2021; 21(1):1058-1-1058-10
Publisher: Springer Nature
Issue Date: 2021
ISSN: 1471-2407
1471-2407
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Sergei Bedrikovetski, Nagendra N. Dudi-Venkata, Hidde M. Kroon, Warren Seow, Ryash Vather, Gustavo Carneiro, James W. Moore, and Tarik Sammour
Abstract: Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used in medical imaging analysis. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of AI models used for detection of lymph node metastasis on pre-operative staging imaging for colorectal cancer. Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using a literature search of PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, IEEE Xplore and the Cochrane Library for studies published from January 2010 to October 2020. Studies reporting on the accuracy of radiomics models and/or deep learning for the detection of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer by CT/MRI were included. Conference abstracts and studies reporting accuracy of image segmentation rather than nodal classification were excluded. The quality of the studies was assessed using a modified questionnaire of the QUADAS-2 criteria. Characteristics and diagnostic measures from each study were extracted. Pooling of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated in a meta-analysis. Results: Seventeen eligible studies were identified for inclusion in the systematic review, of which 12 used radiomics models and five used deep learning models. High risk of bias was found in two studies and there was significant heterogeneity among radiomics papers (73.0%). In rectal cancer, there was a per-patient AUROC of 0.808 (0.739–0.876) and 0.917 (0.882–0.952) for radiomics and deep learning models, respectively. Both models performed better than the radiologists who had an AUROC of 0.688 (0.603 to 0.772). Similarly in colorectal cancer, radiomics models with a perpatient AUROC of 0.727 (0.633–0.821) outperformed the radiologist who had an AUROC of 0.676 (0.627–0.725). Conclusion: AI models have the potential to predict lymph node metastasis more accurately in rectal and colorectal cancer, however, radiomics studies are heterogeneous and deep learning studies are scarce.
Keywords: Colorectal cancer
Artificial intelligence
Radiomics
Deep learning
Machine learning
meta-analysis
Lymph node metastasis
Rights: © The Author(s). 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08773-w
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/180103232
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08773-w
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_133876.pdfPublished version1.18 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.