Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/134363
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMay, Bridget-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2440/134363-
dc.descriptionThis item is only available electronicallyen
dc.description.abstractPain is a subjective experience, making pain assessment difficult. In animals, this becomes even more complicated, especially when assessing pain in conditions that are only presumed to be painful such as equine gastric ulcer syndrome. Characterised by lesions on the mucosa of the equine stomach, this disease has a prevalence of 60-100% . It is not known whether gastric ulcers are painful for horses. The aim of this study was to use subjective (horse grimace scale) and objective (interleukin-1ꞵ) measures to determine if horses with equine gastric ulcer syndrome scored higher than pain-free control horses. A total of 77 horses were assessed for lameness and gastric ulcers and split into 4 groups depending on the presence and absence of each. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups when comparing horse grimace scale scores or interleukin-1ꞵ expression. There was a statistically significant association between horses with grade 4 ulceration of the squamous mucosa and heightened levels of interleukin-1ꞵ, which supported the hypothesis that horses with equine gastric ulcer syndrome would have higher levels of interleukin-1ꞵ than those with less severe ulcers. Whilst some positive results were found, further studies are required to optimize use of the interleukin- 1ꞵ assay as well as using more horses with no ulcers and more horses with severe ulcers to get more definitive results.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectEquineen
dc.subjectEGUSen
dc.subjectInterleukin-1betaen
dc.subjectpain assessmenten
dc.titleAssessment of Pain in Horses With EGUSen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciencesen
dc.provenanceThis electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyight in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the author of this thesis and do not wish it to be made publicly available, or you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legalsen
dc.description.dissertationThesis (BSc(Hons)) - University of Adelaide, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2021-
Appears in Collections:School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
HonoursComplete B May_Redacted.pdf
  Restricted Access
2.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.