Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/136713
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: The U.S. market for imported wildlife not listed in the CITES multilateral treaty
Author: Watters, F.
Stringham, O.
Shepherd, C.R.
Cassey, P.
Citation: Conservation Biology, 2022; 36(6):1-14
Publisher: Wiley
Issue Date: 2022
ISSN: 0888-8892
1523-1739
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Freyja Watters, Oliver Stringham, Chris R. Shepherd, Phillip Cassey
Abstract: The international wildlife trade presents severe conservation and environmental security risks, yet no international regulatory framework exists to monitor the trade of species not listed in the appendices of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). We explored the composition and dynamics of internationally regulated versus nonregulated trade, with a focus on importations of wild-caught terrestrial vertebrates entering the United States from 2009 to 2018. We used 10 years of species-level trade records of the numbers of live, wild-caught animals imported to the United States and data on International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) estimates of extinction risk to determine whether there were differences in the diversity, abundance, and risk to extinction among imports of CITES-listed versus unlisted species. We found 3.6 times the number of unlisted species in U.S. imports compared with CITESlisted species (1366 vs. 378 species). The CITES-listed species were more likely to face reported conservation threats relative to unlisted species (71.7% vs. 27.5%). However, 376 unlisted species faced conversation threats, 297 species had unknown population trends, and 139 species were without an evaluation by the IUCN. Unlisted species appearing for the first time in records were imported 5.5 times more often relative to CITES-listed species. Unlisted reptiles had the largest rate of entry, averaging 53 unique species appearing in imports for the first time per year. Overall trade quantities were approximately 11 times larger for imports of unlisted species relative to imports of CITES-listed species. Countries that were top exporters of CITES-listed species were mostly different from exporters of unlisted species. Because of the vulnerabilities of unlisted, traded species entering the United States and increasing global demand, we strongly recommend governments adapt their policies to monitor and report on the trade of all wildlife.
Keywords: exotic pets; international wildlife trade; IUCN; LEMIS; wildlife regulation
Description: Published December 2022
Rights: © 2022 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13978
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP210103050
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13978
Appears in Collections:Earth and Environmental Sciences publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_136713.pdfPublished version2.48 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.