Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/138980
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGiancaspro, M.-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Law Journal, 2023; 97:457-467-
dc.identifier.issn0004-9611-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2440/138980-
dc.description.abstractThere is currently a great deal of hype surrounding non-fungible tokens (NFT), fuelled largely by several high-profile and high-priced purchases. NFTs, which harness blockchain technology and represent digitally tokenised versions of assets, are largely misunderstood by regulators, lawyers, and even their users. Although they tend to have aesthetic and sentimental appeal, NFTs are also something of a legal anomaly. This article seeks to explain, in comprehensible terms, what NFTs are, and to highlight some of the key concerns that arise from their use across a variety of legal fields including contract, consumer, corporate, taxation and intellectual property law. It is ultimately concluded that users should, for the reasons provided, exercise great caution when entering the NFT market.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityMark Giancaspro-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherThomson Reuters-
dc.rights© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.-
dc.titlePretty, Pricy, Perilous? Demystifying Non-Fungible Tokens and Highlighting Some Key Legal Concerns-
dc.typeJournal article-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidGiancaspro, M. [0000-0002-0121-0590]-
Appears in Collections:Law publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.