Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/139034
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Screening for diabetic retinopathy and reduced vision among Indigenous Australians in Top End primary care health services: a TEAMSnet sub-study
Author: Quinn, N.
Yang, F.
Ryan, C.
Bursell, S.E.
Keech, A.
Atkinson-Briggs, S.
Jenkins, A.
Brazionis, L.
Brown, A.
O’Neal, D.
Liew, D.
Wong, T.
Taylor, H.
O’Dea, K.
Lamoureux, E.
Horton, M.
Citation: Internal Medicine Journal, 2021; 51(11):1897-1905
Publisher: Wiley
Issue Date: 2021
ISSN: 1444-0903
1445-5994
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Nicola Quinn, Feibi Yang, Christopher Ryan, Sven-Erik Bursell, Anthony Keech, Sharon Atkinson-Briggs, Alicia Jenkins, and Laima Brazionis, Centre of Research Excellence in Diabetic Retinopathy Study and TEAMSnet Study Groups
Abstract: Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) prevalence is higher in Indigenous Australians than in other Australians and is a major cause of vision loss. Consequently, timely screening and treatment is paramount, and annual eye screening is recommended for Indigenous Australians. Aims: To assess the prevalence of DR, reduced vision and DR treatment coverage among Indigenous Australian adults with diabetes attending Top End indigenous primary care health services. Methods: A cross-sectional DR screening study conducted from November 2013 to December 2015 in two very remote Northern Territory Aboriginal primary healthcare services. Results: In 287 subjects, the prevalence of non-proliferative DR, proliferative DR and clinically significant diabetic macular oedema was 37.3%, 5.4% and 9.0% respectively. Treatment coverage for PDR was 60% (of 10 patients) and for CSMO was 17% (of 23 patients). Vision data were available from 122 participants at one site. The proportion with normal vision, reduced vision, impaired vision and blindness was 31.1%, 52.5%, 15.6% and 0.8% respectively. Overall, ungradable monocular image sets (46%) were associated with poorer quality images and missing protocol images (both P < 0.001). Ungradable images for DR were associated with presence of small pupils/media opacities (P < 0.001). Ungradable images for diabetic macular oedema were associated with poorer image quality (P < 0.001), cataracts (P < 0.001) and small pupils (P = 0.04). Conclusions: A high prevalence of DR, CSMO and impaired vision was noted in Indigenous Australians with diabetes. Screening in primary care is feasible, but more effective screening methods are needed.
Keywords: diabetic retinopathy; retinal imaging; primary health care
Rights: © 2020 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.
DOI: 10.1111/imj.14971
Grant ID: NHMRC
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imj.14971
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.