Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/139105
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Effect of current direction and muscle activation on motor cortex neuroplasticity induced by repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation
Author: Sasaki, R.
Liao, W.-Y.
Opie, G.M.
Semmler, J.G.
Citation: European Journal of Neuroscience, 2023; 58(5):3270-3285
Publisher: Wiley
Issue Date: 2023
ISSN: 0953-816X
1460-9568
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Ryoki Sasaki, Wei-Yeh Liao, George M. Opie, John G. Semmler
Abstract: Repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at indirect (I)-wave periodicity (iTMS) can increase plasticity in primary motor cortex (M1). Both TMS coil orientation and muscle activation can influence I-wave activity, but it remains unclear how these factors influence M1 plasticity with iTMS. We therefore investigated the influence of TMS coil orientation and muscle activation on the response to iTMS. Thirty-two young adults (24.2 ± 4.8 years) participated in three experiments. Each experiment included two sessions using a modified iTMS intervention with either a posterior-anterior orientation (PA) or anterior-posterior (AP) coil orientation over M1. Stimulation was applied in resting (Experiments 1 and 3) or active muscle (Experiments 2 and 3). Effects of iTMS on M1 excitability were assessed by recording motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) with PA and AP orientations in both resting (all experiments) and active (Experiment 2) muscle. For the resting intervention, MEPs were greater after AP iTMS (Experiment 1, P = .046), whereas SICF was comparable between interventions (all P > .10). For the active intervention, responses did not vary between PA and AP iTMS (Experiment 2, all P > .14), and muscle activation reduced the effect of AP iTMS during the intervention (Experiment 3, P = .002). Coil orientation influenced the MEP response after iTMS, and muscle activation reduced the response during iTMS. While this suggests that AP iTMS may be beneficial in producing a neuroplastic modulation of I-wave circuits in resting muscle, further exploration of factors such as dosing is required.
Keywords: motor-evoked potential; plasticity; primary motor cortex; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Description: First published: 27 July 2023
Rights: © 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.16099
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1139723
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP200101009
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.16099
Appears in Collections:Molecular and Biomedical Science publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_139105.pdfPublished version1.36 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.