Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/140890
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Evolution of surgical approach to rectal cancer resection: A multinational registry assessment
Author: Sijmons, J.M.L.
Dekker, J.W.T.
Tuynman, J.B.
Mohan, H.M.
Smart, P.
Heriot, A.G.
Walker, K.
Kuryba, A.
Matthiessen, P.
Tanis, P.J.
Sammour, T.
Kroon, H.
Peng, S.-L.
Rawson, N.
Philpot, S.
Hayes, I.
Iversen, L.H.
Bjerregaard, J.K.
Qvortrup, C.
Gögenür, I.
et al.
Citation: International Journal of Colorectal Disease: clinical and molecular gastroenterology and surgery, 2024; 39(1):15-1-15-12
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Issue Date: 2024
ISSN: 0179-1958
1432-1262
Statement of
Responsibility: 
International Colorectal Cancer Registry Collaboration (ICORC) Collaborators: Hidde Kroon ... Tarik Sammour ... et al. and Julie M L Sijmons, Jan Willem T Dekker, Jurriaan B Tuynman, Helen M Mohan, Philip Smart, Alexander G Heriot, Kate Walker, Angela Kuryba, Peter Matthiessen, Pieter J Tanis
Abstract: Purpose: Surgical approach to rectal cancer has evolved in recent decades, with introduction of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques and local excision. Since implementation might differ internationally, this study is aimed at evaluating trends in surgical approach to rectal cancer across different countries over the last 10 years and to gain insight into patient, tumour and treatment characteristics. Methods: Pseudo-anonymised data of patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer between 2010 and 2019 were extracted from clinical audits in the Netherlands (NL), Sweden (SE), England-Wales (EW) and Australia-New Zealand (AZ). Results: Ninety-nine thousand five hundred ninety-seven patients were included (38,413 open, 55,155 MIS and 5416 local excision). An overall increase in MIS was observed from 29.9% in 2010 to 72.1% in 2019, with decreasing conversion rates (17.5–9.0%). The MIS proportion was highly variable between countries in the period 2010–2014 (54.4% NL, 45.3% EW, 39.8% AZ, 14.1% SE, P<0.001), but variation reduced over time (2015–2019 78.8% NL, 66.3% EW, 64.3% AZ, 53.2% SE, P<0.001). The proportion of local excision for the two periods was highly variable between countries: 4.7% and 11.8% in NL, 3.9% and 7.4% in EW, 4.7% and 4.6% in AZ, 6.0% and 2.9% in SE. Conclusions: Application and speed of implementation of MIS were highly variable between countries, but each registry demonstrated a significant increase over time. Local excision revealed inconsistent trends over time.
Keywords: Registry; Audit; Rectal cancer; Minimally invasive; Open surgery; Local excision
Rights: © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024, corrected publication 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04578-4
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-023-04578-4
Appears in Collections:Research Outputs

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.