Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/141095
Type: Thesis
Title: The Effect of a Shared Tactical Picture on Distributed Decision Making in a Maritime Identification and Classification Task
Author: Pearce, Thomas
Issue Date: 2022
School/Discipline: School of Psychology
Abstract: Being able to accurately classify and identify unknown vessels in a timely manner is critical in the maritime Defence context. Distributed decision making is a process where multiple people who are not co-located work together on a given task. Research has investigated both the effect of information availability and cognitive load on classification tasks but is limited in the distributed decision making context. This study investigated the benefits of using a common tactical picture over multiple local tactical pictures. A mixed methods approach was used, where 14 pairs of participants completed an identification and classification and then completed a qualitative survey on their strategies. In one condition, participants had their own local tactical picture, and needed to communicate to combine information and complete the task. In the other condition, both participants had access to a common tactical picture, where all information required to complete the task was presented to both participants. Results indicated that the benefits of a common tactical picture were improved accuracy (Mdn correct = 33%, Mdn correct = 27%). NASA TLX scores showed participants felt that they had to use more effort in the local tactical picture condition (Mdn = 70, Mdn = 62.5). Qualitative themes indicated that the benefits of using a common tactical picture allowed teams to dynamically share workload. The implications of this study involve the development of team structures that facilitate expert teaming.
Dissertation Note: Thesis (M.Psych (Organisational & Human Factors)) -- University of Adelaide, School of Psychology, 2022
Keywords: Masters; Psychology; OHF
Description: This item is only available electronically.
Provenance: This electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the author of this thesis and do not wish it to be made publicly available, or you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legals
Appears in Collections:School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PearceT_2022_Masters.pdf1.98 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.