Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/22648
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Longitudinal comparison of factors influencing choice of dental treatment by private general practitioners
Author: Brennan, D.
Spencer, A.
Citation: Australian Dental Journal, 2006; 51(2):117-123
Publisher: Australian Dental Assn Inc
Issue Date: 2006
ISSN: 0045-0421
1834-7819
Organisation: Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health
Statement of
Responsibility: 
DS Brennan, AJ Spencer
Abstract: Background: Service rate variations and appropriateness of care issues have focused attention on factors that influence treatment decisions. The aims of this study were to examine what factors dentists consider in choosing alternative treatments, the stability of these factors over time and whether stability of treatment choice was related to age of dentist. Methods: Baseline data were collected by mailed self-complete questionnaires from a random sample of Australian dentists (response rate=60.3 per cent, n=345 private general practitioners provided service data from a typical day) in 1997–1998 and followup data were collected in 2004 (response rate=76.8 per cent, n=177 matched longitudinal cases). Results: The most frequent factors considered important across six alternative treatment pair choice scenarios were caries rate for ‘exam v. x-ray’, age of patient for ‘preventive v. restorative intervention’, cost of treatment for ‘crown v. buildup’, ‘root canal v. extraction’ and ‘bridge v. denture’, and calculus for ‘prophylaxis v. scaling’. The only differences over time were (t-test, P<0.05): higher proportions of responses in the mouth status group at follow-up for ‘exam v. x-ray’; higher proportions of responses in the visit history group at follow-up for ‘preventive v. restorative intervention’; a lower proportion of responses in the caries group at follow-up for ‘crown v. build-up’; and a higher proportion of responses in the treatment constraints group at follow-up for ‘prophylaxis v. scaling’. Conclusions: While a wide range of responses were offered as factors influencing the choice of alternative treatments, cost of treatment was a major consideration in situations where significantly cheaper alternatives existed, while patient preference was commonly included as a secondary consideration across a wide range of treatment choice scenarios. The treatment choice responses showed a high degree of stability over time across all age groups of dentists, suggesting that if routines are developed these are established before or soon after graduation as a dentist.
Keywords: treatment choice
general dental practice
Description: The document attached has been archived with permission from the Australian Dental Association. An external link to the publisher’s copy is included.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2006.tb00414.x
Published version: http://www.ada.org.au/App_CmsLib/Media/Lib/0610/M27473_v1_632966969322550000.pdf
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 2
Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health publications
Dentistry publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
adj_V51n2_2006_BreLon.pdfPublished version272.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.