Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/24081
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKidgell, D.-
dc.contributor.authorSale, M.-
dc.contributor.authorSemmler, J.-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationExperimental Brain Research, 2006; 175(4):745-753-
dc.identifier.issn0014-4819-
dc.identifier.issn1432-1106-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/24081-
dc.descriptionThe original publication can be found at www.springerlink.com-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the study was to quantify the strength of motor unit synchronization and coherence from pairs of concurrently active motor units before and after short-term (4–8 weeks) strength training of the left first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. Five subjects (age 24.8 ± 4.3 years) performed a training protocol three times/week that consisted of six sets of ten maximal isometric index finger abductions, whereas three subjects (age 27.3 ± 6.7 years) acted as controls. Motor unit activity was recorded from pairs of intramuscular electrodes in the FDI muscle with two separate motor unit recording sessions obtained before and after strength training (trained group) or after 4 weeks of normal daily activities that did not involve training (control group). The training intervention resulted in a 54% (45.2 ± 8.3 to 69.5 ± 13.8 N, P = 0.001) increase in maximal index finger abduction force, whereas there was no change in strength in the control group. A total of 163 motor unit pairs (198 single motor units) were examined in both subject groups, with 52 motor unit pairs obtained from 10 recording sessions before training and 51 motor unit pairs from 10 recording sessions after training. Using the cross-correlation procedure, there was no change in the strength of motor unit synchronization following strength training (common input strength index; 0.71 ± 0.41 to 0.67 ± 0.43 pulses/s). Furthermore, motor unit coherence z scores at low (0–10 Hz; 3.9 ± 0.3 before to 4.4 ± 0.4 after) or high (10–30 Hz; 1.7 ± 0.1 before to 1.9 ± 0.1 after) frequencies were not influenced by strength training. These motor unit data indicate that increases in strength following several weeks of training a hand muscle are not accompanied by changes in motor unit synchronization or coherence, suggesting that these features of correlated motor unit activity are not important in the expression of muscle strength.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityDawson J. Kidgell, Martin V. Sale and John G. Semmler-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0724-z-
dc.subjectHand-
dc.subjectFingers-
dc.subjectMuscle, Skeletal-
dc.subjectMotor Cortex-
dc.subjectEfferent Pathways-
dc.subjectMotor Neurons-
dc.subjectNeuromuscular Junction-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectElectromyography-
dc.subjectHand Strength-
dc.subjectLearning-
dc.subjectEvoked Potentials, Motor-
dc.subjectAction Potentials-
dc.subjectMuscle Contraction-
dc.subjectTime Factors-
dc.subjectPhysical Fitness-
dc.subjectAdult-
dc.subjectMuscle Strength-
dc.titleMotor unit synchronization measured by cross-correlation is not influenced by short-term strength training of a hand muscle-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00221-006-0724-z-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidSemmler, J. [0000-0003-0260-8047]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 2
Molecular and Biomedical Science publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.