Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/47328
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: A comparative study of the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United Kingdom, Denmark, and Australia
Author: Ashton, H.
Norman, P.
Coutto, E.
Scott, R. A. P.
Duffy, S.
Vardulaki, K.
Jamrozik, Konrad
Walker, N.
Lindholt, J.
Citation: Journal of Medical Screening, 2001; 8(1):46-50
Publisher: Royal Society of Medicine Press
Issue Date: 2001
ISSN: 0969-1413
School/Discipline: School of Population Health and Clinical Practice
Organisation: Collaborative Aneurysm Screening Study Group (CASS Group)
Chichester Aneurysm Screening Group (UK)
Viborg Aneurysm Screening Study (Denmark)
Western Australia Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Program (Australia)
Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS)(UK)
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Collaborative Aneurysm Screening Study Group (CASS Group), Chichester Aneurysm Screening Group (UK), Viborg Aneurysm Screening Study (Denmark), Western Australia Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Program (Australia) and Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS)(UK)
Abstract: Objectives: To compare attendance and prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in population based randomised trials of sonographic screening in the United Kingdom, Western Australia, and Denmark. Methods: 65 290 men were randomised to screening in the four trials, and data were collected and analysed from 46 397 aortic scans for men aged between 64 and 83 years who attended one of four community screening programmes. Comparisons were made for age standardised populations (65–74 years). Results: Age standardised attendance varied between 74% and 81%, and was highest in the United Kingdom and lowest in Western Australia. Age standardised prevalence of AAAs of 3.0 cm or more varied significantly between 4.5% and 7.7%, and was highest in the United Kingdom and lowest in Denmark. Conclusions: Participation in the four programmes compares favourably with other reported screening studies. The possibility that variations may reflect the different recruitment methods used is discussed. The prevalence of AAA in central Denmark would appear to be significantly different from that in southern England and Western Australia.
Rights: © 2001 Medical Screening Society
DOI: 10.1136/jms.8.1.46
Published version: http://jms.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/46
Appears in Collections:General Practice publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.