Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/71392
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | A response to Antonakis and Dietz: Looking for validity or testing it? |
Author: | Warwick, J. Nettelbeck, T. Ward, L. |
Citation: | Personality and Individual Differences, 2011; 50(3):416-417 |
Publisher: | Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd |
Issue Date: | 2011 |
ISSN: | 0191-8869 |
Statement of Responsibility: | J. Warwick, T. Nettelbeck, L. Ward |
Abstract: | Warwick, Nettelbeck, & Ward (2010) have claimed that the Ability Emotional Intelligence Measure (AEIM) provides a reliable and valid measure of abilities-based emotional intelligence. Antonakis and Dietz (2010) questioned whether the statistical analyses undertaken in relation to the AEIM was valid. The central issue raised by Antonakis and Dietz (2010) is whether the Warwick et al. (2010) study was testing validity or looking for it. To address this issue, the present authors present their arguments for the reasonableness of testing the AEIM via hierarchical regression analyses, and extreme group analyses. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. |
Keywords: | Emotional intelligence AEIM |
Rights: | Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.025 |
Published version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.025 |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest Psychology publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.