Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/76041
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | How much of a trust is a constructive trust? |
Author: | Wright, D. |
Citation: | Trusts and Trustees, 2012; 18(3):264-272 |
Publisher: | Oxford University Press |
Issue Date: | 2012 |
ISSN: | 1363-1780 1752-2110 |
Statement of Responsibility: | David Wright |
Abstract: | Is the constructive trust really a trust? To answer this simple question, it is essential to understand the current meaning of the constructive term. There are many different meanings applicable to this term. Different jurisdictions (and different cases within the same jurisdiction) emphasize different aspects of the term. Outside of the USA, where a purely remedial approach is taken to the constructive trust and so it is not envisaged as a trust, then the question remains; is it a trust? In a very recent article Swadling has answered this question in the negative. However, his very important and well considered argument is not totally convincing. On balance, the constructive trust, even the Australian remedial constructive trust, remains a trust. |
Rights: | © The Author (2012). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. |
DOI: | 10.1093/tandt/tts010 |
Published version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tandt/tts010 |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 4 Law publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.