Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/80897
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHannaford, N.-
dc.contributor.authorMandel, C.-
dc.contributor.authorCrock, C.-
dc.contributor.authorBuckley, K.-
dc.contributor.authorMagrabi, F.-
dc.contributor.authorOng, M.-
dc.contributor.authorAllen, S.-
dc.contributor.authorSchultz, T.-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Radiology, 2013; 86(1022):20120336-1-20120336-11-
dc.identifier.issn0007-1285-
dc.identifier.issn1748-880X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/80897-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To determine the type and nature of incidents occurring within medical imaging settings in Australia and identify strategies that could be engaged to reduce the risk of their re-occurrence. Methods: 71 search terms, related to clinical handover and communication, were applied to 3976 incidents in the Radiology Events Register. Detailed classification and thematic analysis of a subset of incidents that involved handover or communication (n=298) were undertaken to identify the most prevalent types of error and to make recommendations about patient safety initiatives in medical imaging. Results: Incidents occurred most frequently during patient preparation (34%), when requesting imaging (27%) and when communicating a diagnosis (23%). Frequent problems within each of these stages of the imaging cycle included: inadequate handover of patients (41%) or unsafe or inappropriate transfer of the patient to or from medical imaging (35%); incorrect information on the request form (52%); and delayed communication of a diagnosis (36%) or communication of a wrong diagnosis (36%). Conclusion: The handover of patients and clinical information to and from medical imaging is fraught with error, often compromising patient safety and resulting in communication of delayed or wrong diagnoses, unnecessary radiation exposure and a waste of limited resources. Corrective strategies to address safety concerns related to new information technologies, patient transfer and inadequate test result notification policies are relevant to all healthcare settings.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityN Hannaford, C Mandel, C Crock, K Buckley, F Magrabi, M Ong, S Allen, and T Schultz-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBritish Institute of Radiology-
dc.rights© 2013 The Authors-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20120336-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectDiagnostic Errors-
dc.subjectDiagnostic Imaging-
dc.subjectTransportation of Patients-
dc.subjectHospitalization-
dc.subjectRisk Assessment-
dc.subjectCommunication-
dc.subjectAdolescent-
dc.subjectAdult-
dc.subjectAged-
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over-
dc.subjectMiddle Aged-
dc.subjectChild-
dc.subjectChild, Preschool-
dc.subjectInfant-
dc.subjectMedical Errors-
dc.subjectReferral and Consultation-
dc.subjectAustralia-
dc.subjectFemale-
dc.subjectMale-
dc.subjectYoung Adult-
dc.subjectDelayed Diagnosis-
dc.subjectPatient Safety-
dc.subjectPatient Handoff-
dc.titleLearning from incident reports in the Australian medical imaging setting: handover and communication errors-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.contributor.departmentFaculty of Health Sciences-
dc.identifier.doi10.1259/bjr.20120336-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidSchultz, T. [0000-0003-1419-3328]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 2
Nursing publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_80897.pdfPublished version586.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.