Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/81796
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | Contract law and inequality - A response to Frank Carrigan |
Author: | Gava, J. |
Citation: | Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 2013; 13(1):9-15 |
Publisher: | Hart Publishing |
Issue Date: | 2013 |
ISSN: | 1472-9342 1757-8469 |
Statement of Responsibility: | John Gava |
Abstract: | Frank Carrigan argues that the legalistic judging of Sir Owen Dixon is a trivial matter because it merely reproduces and reinforces the substantive inequality between persons in our society. I agree that inequality in our society is real and needs to be addressed. However, given the limitations of judges and the institutional limitations of the courts, contract law is a poor vehicle for overcoming such inequality when compared to the many social, economic and political policy options open to governments. Not only, however, is contract law a misconceived tool for the amelioration of poverty; to use it in this way runs the real risk of destroying one of its most significant attributes—the formal equality enshrined in the common law of contract. |
Rights: | Copyright status unknown |
DOI: | 10.5235/14729342.13.1.9 |
Published version: | http://adelaideaus.library.ingentaconnect.com.proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/content/hart/ouclj/2013/00000013/00000001/art00002?token=004d19027258495fb6e5865462431516f3b47634c7a782a44455e4e26636a6b7c2530332976c6 |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 4 Law publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.