Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/81796
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Contract law and inequality - A response to Frank Carrigan
Author: Gava, J.
Citation: Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 2013; 13(1):9-15
Publisher: Hart Publishing
Issue Date: 2013
ISSN: 1472-9342
1757-8469
Statement of
Responsibility: 
John Gava
Abstract: Frank Carrigan argues that the legalistic judging of Sir Owen Dixon is a trivial matter because it merely reproduces and reinforces the substantive inequality between persons in our society. I agree that inequality in our society is real and needs to be addressed. However, given the limitations of judges and the institutional limitations of the courts, contract law is a poor vehicle for overcoming such inequality when compared to the many social, economic and political policy options open to governments. Not only, however, is contract law a misconceived tool for the amelioration of poverty; to use it in this way runs the real risk of destroying one of its most significant attributes—the formal equality enshrined in the common law of contract.
Rights: Copyright status unknown
DOI: 10.5235/14729342.13.1.9
Published version: http://adelaideaus.library.ingentaconnect.com.proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/content/hart/ouclj/2013/00000013/00000001/art00002?token=004d19027258495fb6e5865462431516f3b47634c7a782a44455e4e26636a6b7c2530332976c6
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 4
Law publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.