Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/82923
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStuart, K.-
dc.contributor.authorWyld, B.-
dc.contributor.authorBastiaans, K.-
dc.contributor.authorStocks, N.-
dc.contributor.authorBrinkworth, G.-
dc.contributor.authorMohr, P.-
dc.contributor.authorNoakes, M.-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationPublic Health Nutrition, 2014; 17(3):640-647-
dc.identifier.issn1368-9800-
dc.identifier.issn1475-2727-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/82923-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate a primary prevention care model using telephone support delivered through an existing health call centre to general practitioner-referred patients at risk of developing CVD, using objective measures of CVD risk reduction and weight loss. Design: Participants were randomised into two groups: (i) those receiving a telephone-supported comprehensive lifestyle intervention programme (CLIP: written structured diet and exercise advice, plus seven telephone sessions with the Heart Foundation Health Information Service); and (ii) those receiving usual care from their general practitioner (control: written general lifestyle advice). Fasting plasma lipids, blood pressure, weight, waist circumference and height were assessed on general practice premises by a practice nurse at Weeks 0 and 12. Setting: Two general practices in Adelaide, South Australia. Subjects: Forty-nine men and women aged 48·0 (sd 5·88) years identified by their general practitioner as being at future risk of CVD (BMI = 33·13 (sd 5·39) kg/m2; LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) = 2·66 (sd 0·92) mmol/l). Results: CLIP participants demonstrated significantly greater reductions in LDL-C (estimated mean (EM) = 1·98 (se 0·17) mmol/l) and total cholesterol (EM = 3·61 (se 0·21) mmol/l) at Week 12 when compared with the control group (EM = 3·23 (se 0·18) mmol/l and EM = 4·77 (se 0·22) mmol/l, respectively). There were no significant treatment effects for systolic blood pressure (F(1,45) = 0·28, P = 0·60), diastolic blood pressure (F(1,43) = 0·52, P = 0·47), weight (F(1,42) = 3·63, P = 0·063) or waist circumference (F(1,43) = 0·32, P = 0·577). Conclusions: In general practice patients, delivering CLIP through an existing telephone health service is effective in achieving reductions in LDL-C and total cholesterol. While CLIP may have potential for wider implementation to support primary prevention of CVD, longer-term cost-effectiveness data are warranted.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityKeren Louise Stuart, Belinda Wyld, Kathryn Bastiaans, Nigel Stocks, Grant Brinkworth, Phil Mohr and Manny Noakes-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherC A B I Publishing-
dc.rights© The Authors 2013-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1368980013000220-
dc.subjectTelephone support-
dc.subjectweight loss-
dc.subjectlipid reduction-
dc.subjectgeneral practice-
dc.titleA telephone-supported cardiovascular lifestyle programme (CLIP) for lipid reduction and weight loss in general practice patients: a randomised controlled pilot trial-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1368980013000220-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidStocks, N. [0000-0002-9018-0361]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
General Practice publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RA_hdl_82923.pdf
  Restricted Access
Restricted Access146.32 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.